|
Rude Americans?
October 17, 2005
Once a year or so, a national "rudeness" poll is
conducted in the United States. Invariably, the
polltakers conclude that Americans are ruder than ever
before. And in the few days that follow the release of
the researchers' findings, American rudeness is big
news. "Our crazy modern world" (and its new
technologies, entertainments, and so on) is trotted
out as the primary culprit. Journalists and
interviewees alike wax nostalgic for a simpler,
more-polite past.
The latest such news story came out over the AP wires
on Friday, October 14. (Click here to read the story.)
But don't you believe it.
For as long as people have had a sense of what "good
manners" are, people have decried their decline and,
as this most recent article does, declared them at a
"breaking point." Our times are no exception.
The past was not perfect, either. You can't point to
any era and say, "Ah! That was when everyone was
polite." Someone interviewed for this recent AP
article seems to long for the era of the TV show
"Father Knows Best." Now, I wholeheartedly agree that
modern inventions such as reality television and
camera cell phones have created new behavioral
problems. But the United States of the 1950s was no
courtesy utopia. It had its good points, sure, but the
1950s were also a time of institutionalized racism and
sexism, and widespread oppression.
Can 2005 be characterized by a large number of loud,
selfish, indiscreet people? You bet. Would I trade
2005 for 1955? No way -- I don't care how charming the
earlier era's TV families were.
Etiquette and behavior are supposed to change with the
times. Change unsettles many of us in the etiquette
biz, but not all change is bad. For instance, in this
article, "holding doors for a female" is cited as one
example of courteous behavior that is on the decline.
However, the article doesn't note that this
door-holding-for-ladies stuff is not always
appropriate in the workplace, where, nowadays, you
ought not treat ladies and gentlemen too differently.
This is a nuanced issue and a good example of
something that's changing in our times (I fear that
not acknowledging this fact will make many readers
believe that "etiquette" is out of touch -- a bunch of
irrelevant frivolity).
I look forward to a future in which anyone can hold a
door for anyone else without worrying about gender
roles.
Another thing that bothers me about these articles is
that we can't know how valid the poll responders'
complaints are. Very often, when someone says, "People
are so rude!" he's really saying, "People won't let me
have my way!" According to this recent poll, "the most
common complaint about rudeness . . . was aggressive
or reckless driving." Yes, rude drivers are a real
problem. But have you ever noticed who complains the
loudest about rude drivers? That's right: even ruder
drivers -- the jerks who lean on the horn and shout
obscenities when another car dares to block their path
for a moment.
Go ahead -- ring up one of these people and ask, "Is
courtesy on the decline?" You can be sure he or she
will respond with an emotional plea for better manners
on the freeway.
The worst thing about these stories is their
underlying message: "People are rude. There's nothing
to be done. Only a sucker would be polite if no one
else is going to do it." This attitude is the real
problem -- too many people are using others' rudeness
as an excuse to be rude themselves. Here's the thing
-- and it's very important: Sometimes, you have to be
polite even when no one around you is. Others' bad
behavior doesn't have to affect your behavior. This
fundamental idea is missing from every "rude
Americans" article I've read.
Anyway, I'd rather see articles that explored the ways
our social behavior was changing and evolving. This
would give people information, instead of leading them
to believe that there is no hope. And there is hope.
There are plenty of polite Americans -- who turn their
telephones off during dinner and while socializing
with one another (as is only proper), and are
therefore likely to miss telephone calls from opinion pollsters.
|
 |